Davidson Fellows 2027: What to Know Before the Fall Application Window Opens

Published · Contest profile · Multi-discipline · Age 18 and under

A student's desk with a research notebook, printed charts and a laptop under a warm lamp

The Davidson Fellows Scholarship is structurally different from almost every other award profiled on this site, and the difference determines whether a student should be looking at it at all. It is not a competition you enter and then do the work for. It is an award for a significant piece of work that already exists.

The 2027 application opens in fall 2026, with submissions historically due in early February. That timing is the reason to read this now rather than in January: a student who does not already have a substantial body of work is not going to assemble one inside the window.

What is actually on offer

Davidson awards scholarships at three levels — $100,000, $50,000, and $25,000 — to students 18 years old or younger who have completed a significant piece of work. There is no minimum age. Applicants must be U.S. citizens or permanent residents residing in the United States.

The absence of a minimum age is not a technicality. Davidson Fellows have historically included students well below high-school age, and the award is one of the few at this level where a thirteen-year-old with genuinely advanced work is evaluated on the work rather than filtered out by grade band.

The eight categories

Applications are submitted in one of eight categories: Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, Literature, Music, Philosophy, and Outside the Box.

Two of those deserve comment. Literature and Music sit alongside the STEM categories on equal terms, which is unusual at this award level — most scholarships of comparable size are STEM-only. For a student whose serious work is a body of writing or composition rather than a research project, this is one of the very few places that work competes for six-figure funding.

Outside the Box exists for work that does not fit the other seven. It is not a lower-competition side door; it is for projects whose discipline genuinely has no home on the list, and a project that would sit comfortably in Science should be entered in Science.

The bar: college graduate level

The single most useful published statement about what Davidson is looking for is that projects should be at, or close to, the college graduate level, with real depth of knowledge in the particular area of study.

That phrasing sets a bar that most strong high-school work does not clear, and it is worth being honest about. An excellent science-fair project, a well-received school literary magazine, or a strong regional competition result are not the same thing as work a graduate committee would recognise as a contribution. The students who succeed here have usually been working on one thing for years, frequently with a university mentor, and often have external validation — a publication, a performance, a patent, an independent adjudication — that exists outside the application.

For a student who is not there, the honest advice is that Davidson is a target for a later year and the intervening time is better spent deepening one project than distributing effort across several.

How the application is structured

The process runs in two parts. The first asks for a brief description of the project or portfolio, which serves as an eligibility check before anyone invests in a full submission. The second is the substantive one: it collects nominator information and sends those nominators their forms, and it is where the category-specific requirements are submitted.

The nominator step is the one that most often causes trouble, because it depends on other people's calendars. A nominator form requested in late January against an early-February deadline is a request for a favour under time pressure, from someone who may be mid-semester. Identify nominators before the window opens and ask them then.

What to do this autumn

The Davidson Fellows application rewards preparation that happened long before the form existed. The useful question this autumn is not "how do I apply" but "is the work far enough along" — and for most students the answer arrives a year or two before the deadline does.